I did some research on the timelines of the ancient civilizations and that of the supposed evolutionary time frames.

I compared them and found a few errors-- this is a comparison based on old evolutionary theory; new anthropological studies have shown that we did not mate with supposed earlier sub humans and that advanced civilization did not evolve but emerged suddenly. I'm basically just substantiating it--

The first thing I noticed was that according to standard evolutionary time frames we developed basic language around 500,000 yrs ago and started using stone tools around 1.5 billion yrs ago yet the earliest written inscriptions in cuneiform have been dated to around 3,500 bc?

Supposedly modern humans like you and I first originated on the earth around 200,000 years ago near the middle east/Africa and were communicating with each other yet records of such communication were only dated to be as recent as a few thousand years ago?

Supposedly within just a few thousand years these modern humans had spread to every continent across the entire planet and onto many islands yet the historical timelines regarding ancient civilizations state that the earliest civilization was that of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt... the other civilizations then followed.

However, according to the historical charts these ancient civilizations developed writing around the same time- 3,500 bc.

So how did any of these ancient civilizations writings predate one another when they developed writing around the same time?

"In historical archaeology, the ancient literature of the Iron Age includes the earliest texts preserved in manuscript tradition. Sanskrit literature and Chinese literature flourished in the Iron Age. Other texts include the Avestan Gathas, the Indian Vedas and the oldest parts of the Hebrew Bible. The principal feature that distinguishes the Iron Age from the preceding ages is the introduction of alphabetic characters, and the consequent development of written language which enabled literature and historic record."

But archaeologists have found some villages that are believed to have been built more than 8,000 years ago. Some of these ancient villages, such as Jericho, survive to this day.

So these ancient civilizations were advanced enough to build cities yet were not intelligent enough to be literate yet these ancient cities were documented by ancient civilizations in historical accounts? Such as the biblical scriptures-- Jericho is the city in the bible in which Joshua defeats the battle of Jericho.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/17/skull-homo-erectus-human-evolution

Accordingto the above article, all of the subspecies that preceded the homo erectus species are actually the same species. There has been much scholarly debate as to whether the aforementioned species should be classified as the genus homo (human) or australopithecus (ape).

They really don’t have enough evidence to state whether or not the skeletons were anatomically modern or not. They found a skull and a few fragments. Judging from the skull (and the fact that they were found with other primitive animals) they belonged to australopithecus.

They were speculated to have been anatomically modern in the article which is amusing. Because it contradicts the rest of the article which says there were no variants in the species-- but the earlier species were supposedly not as modern?

The site below contains images of the species homo erectus. All of these species are now the same and belong to homo erectus except for the species homo neanderthalensis. Such is apparent when viewing the images as those now classified as homo erectus seem to more closely resemble the genus australopithecus or that of the great apes. In contrast, the neanderthalensis more closely resemble modern humans.

In summary, modern humans were never related to the genus australopithecus (that of the great ape). Homo neanderthalensis and homo sapiens are our only ancestors.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species

A few people claim that the biblical scriptures state the earth is 10,000 years old or something.

This is not correct.

In fact, logically one would assume after reading the scriptures that there was a considerable length of time between the early chapters of genesis and the flood as the entire earth was populated and people lived hundreds of years. I think people get thrown off because the scriptures focus on the genealogy of Noah/Abraham. The rest of Adam and Eves children (that populated the earth) are not specifically addressed--except in instances like when Cain travels to another area to take wife.

A few thousand years may have passed between Noah’s time and now but more than likely a considerable amount of time passed between now and the beginning of time.

The early writings were supposedly written only a few thousand years ago probably because the only writings we have are from after the flood.

When I said that recent studies have shown that we did not mate with earlier subhumans I was referring to those of the genus homo erectus and that preceding it (which are now considered the same species-- that of the great ape).

Modern homo sapiens and neanderthals did interbreed. Homo sapiens, cro magnon, and neanderthals were considered anatomically modern humans however the neanderthals were a lot stronger and the cro magnon were a lot taller.

But both the cro magnon and neanderthals died out:

Genesis 6:1-10

1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose . 3 And the LORD said , My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh : yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. 4 There were giants [nephilim] in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. 5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. 7 And the LORD said , I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. 8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD. 9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth....

Note the fourth verse:

It says 'the same became mighty men which were of [old]'

'men of [renown]'

This verse has multiple meanings.

One of which is alluding to the evolutionary debate in time.

And another which refers to the fallen.

And mythological worship of the entities.

....

The neanderthals were the offspring of the nephilim. That is why they were speculated to have been larger and stronger than modern humans.

In mythology what they call gods mated with the daughters on earth creating demigods. The mythological gods were different because they were considered mighty 'men' in human form. They were the nephilim and their offspring.

{The fallen angels distinguished disobeying the gods/themselves as being a lesser offense because they were not actual gods. The fallen angels wanted to present themselves in that way in order to undermine the power of God himself. They also wanted to depict women as evil in order to discard the power of love through God. If Satan can destroy the original love between man and woman then he can promote evil at the same time through this feat. The Greeks were confused by the fallen angels and taught to believe that hope was a bad thing as well. Hope, love etc are the fruit of the spirit and essentually necessary for true happiness and a relationship with the true God. Also, Aphrodite was portrayed to represent love but this was a canvas for the promotion of lust. These fallen angels or "gods" also came here to annul the consequences of these evil actions: wrath, lust, power and pride in man.. in order to discourage the fear of a spiritual deity or God himself that advises against this. "The gods bow to fate" according to Greek history and this was a way for Satan to make it look like we have "no gaurantees in life" or "no choices of our own". Which is completely incorrect. We make our own choices or we wouldn’t be here making our own choices. When man consulted the oracle they were actually consulting a demon. The reason that the oracle told them devastating things which would always be uncertain was so that they would live their life in fear thus demoting faith, hope, and love. The fallen angels/gods also were able to do anything they wanted to the excess but the men were not able to do this. This was another way to pervert the concept of a caring and just God. To make the rulership of a supreme being seem unfair in order to provoke pride in man.. and pride is the root of all sin.

The reason these people fell to deception is because they believed in what they could "see." Satan is still using the same tool of deception today through men that claim to be God. There are many instances such as with James Ray and other prominent figures in which people have actually died because they believed in these idols so much. But back to topic. Satan and the angels that followed him were cast out into the earth and allowed to try to influence men for a certain period of time. One of the ways in which they chose to do this was by appearing as gods. This was obviously to provoke men into sin but what would be the primary reason? What is Satan’s ultimate goal? To oppose God. To prove to God that he can get people to turn away from Him. Satan knew the promise God made to him in Genesis and that Jesus would one day come to earth to annihilate him so he began (shortly after God told him this) to appear as a god in "human form". This is significant because not only does it make God seem to be a "myth" but it would also sway God’s people into believing Jesus is a hoax. God allows Satan to do this to see who really despises sin and who will remain loyal to what he has told them. Regardless of what they see or hear. Cause we all know the truth in our heart. God spoke to the people in certain ways in the bible but the sons of god/fallen angels were swaying God’s people to follow them to the extent that He repented ever making them. He sent the flood to kill off the evil seeds but He found Noah/his family righteous and told them to replenish the earth. Abraham and God’s prophets descended from here. Paul was a descendent of Abraham who then went and told the Greeks /Romans to stop worshipping false gods by following Greek mythology.

This was Paul’s message to the Romans:

"For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities-- His eternal power and divine nature-- have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified Him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised."

....

I’ve been doing research on these mass murders/suicides that have happened over the years and the people that blindly followed certain men that claimed to be God/Jesus. I don’t understand. It’s like these men really are insane. One of them jumped off a cliff and attempted to ascend into heaven?  

 “How you are fallen from heaven,
O Lucifer, son of the morning!
How you are cut down to the ground,
You who weakened the nations!
 For you have said in your heart:
‘I will ascend into heaven,
I will exalt my throne above the stars of God;
I will also sit on the mount of the congregation
On the farthest sides of the north;
 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds,
I will be like the Most High.’"

Isaiah 14: 12-14

I’m getting the impression that these men were given over to a reprobate mind. Then, as a result, Satan had his way with them and began controlling their mind but he did this for his own benefit. Again, this was to make God/Jesus look like a hoax as well as his true followers. But why do so many people blindly follow these men? It’s like they are hypnotized? They end up dying because they have no voice of reason in their minds? They rejected the Lord and chose Satan instead.. so they no longer have a conscience... that’s why they seem to harm themselves without any regard.

 But why do they listen to these men in the first place and become so loyal to them? Why do so many people buy their books and take their authority as something reliable? So many people are deceived. It’s like they are drawn to them. It’s because they have God given charisma.. but they use it for Satan instead of God.. as our callings are without repentance.

God has more charisma than Satan could ever think of having cause his charisma came from God. Satan is attacking the people that have the most God given charisma. And they are falling for his lies. And once he can get them to fall for his lies then they are a magnet for others that are not so charismatic so the people blindly follow what they say. And, in the end, they eventually become Satan’s puppets.

But the spiritists, the atheists, the Satan worshippers… everyone in this world was actually meant to serve God.

Satan was God’s chosen angel. The most honored. But he let the power get to him. He corrupted that which was good in him and turned it into something negative. The same thing happens to those that were given gifts from God but allow the gifts to corrupt them. They listen to Satan.. but it is their choice. That’s why were here… to make that choice.}

 

 

 

We have found evidence of symbolic art which indicates that early humans were quite a bit more advanced than we thought. However, in order for symbolic thought to be interpreted one would have to be reasonably literate as thoughts and images account for basic language. Therefore, scientists are confused as to why these images are present in caves supposedly long before the development of language.

There is also evidence that these ancient humans were rather skilled craftsmen and engaged in a form of flint knapping.

These findings are confusing because one skilled enough to practice a form of flint knapping would typically be civilized enough to reside within a village and those practicing symbolic art should also have remnants of language.

We don’t have enough information to reach a clear resolution because there are portions of evidence missing probably due to some type of disaster... like a flood.

....

Scientists got thrown off due to the way civilization appears to have began only a few thousand years ago... yet they are finding skeletons of humans from long before that. So they are attempting to create hypotheses (like that we lacked the intellect to form villages) for why civilization appears to have emerged suddenly only a few thousand yrs ago yet there is evidence of human existence centuries before. It’s obvious that it’s due to the flood but that’s too outré for them so they had to find a more reasonable explanation-- that we used to be monkeys.

But then they were like oh, no wait.

Monkeys can’t form symbolic art

Or bury their dead

Or 'morph into humans'

Maybe we got it wrong.

Nevermind.

We’re smarter than we thought.

Recent Studies Show We Were Never Apes

Latest comments

15.07 | 23:36

for anyone interested in a different and critical perspective on t...

11.08 | 06:25

Satan wants him to commit suicide because he's living a miserable life.. I...

11.08 | 06:23

I noticed that most spiritual twinflame relationships are under intense at...

06.01 | 04:07

This article is super misleading. What is the difference in yo...